2001) (requiring coworkers of plaintiff mental health counselor to assume disproportionate workload to accommodate plaintiff’s request to not counsel sure shoppers on religious grounds would involve greater than de minimis price); Bhatia v. Chevron USA, Inc., 734 F.2d 1382, 1384 (9th Cir. 4 (E.D. Ark. Oct. 3, 2007) (denying abstract judgment for employer on declare by two staff that they have been improperly denied leave for annual religious observance that may have required company to pay time beyond regulation wages of approximately $220 every to 2 replacements, the place facility routinely paid technicians extra time, employer failed to contact union about attainable accommodation, and policy providing for only one technician on depart per day was not all the time observed, and there was no evidence that customer support needs really went unmet on day at problem) (jury verdict for plaintiffs subsequently entered), appeal dismissed, 550 F.3d 704 (8th Cir. 1999) (holding that employer was not required to accommodate job applicant’s religiously based mostly refusal to offer his social security quantity where employer sought it to comply with Internal Revenue Service and Immigration and Naturalization Service necessities). 1987) (ruling that employer could not demonstrate that paying substitute worker premium wages would cause undue hardship because plaintiff would have been paid premium wages for hours at subject).
October 2024